Everyone Deserves Free Speech. Even Nazis.

The definition of hate speech is subjective. For some people, hate speech is anything that could be remotely offensive. For others, hate speech is only racist, sexist, or homophobic language. And for some people, hate speech is only violent or threatening language. Obviously, there’s a lot of room for interpretation here.

This subjectivity is important to keep in mind when thinking about whether or not Nazis deserve free speech. On the one hand, you could argue that Nazis are engaging in hate speech when they talk about Jews, minorities, and other groups of people. On the other hand, you could argue that Nazis are simply expressing their political beliefs and should therefore be protected under the First Amendment.

Of course, there are valid points on both sides of this debate. However, I believe that everyone deserves free speech, even Nazis. Here’s why.

First, it’s important to remember that the First Amendment protects all speech, even hateful speech. The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld this principle, most notably in the landmark case of Brandenburg v. Ohio. In that case, the Court ruled that the government cannot punish hate speech unless it is “likely to produce imminent lawless action.”

This is an important distinction. The government can’t punish someone for simply expressing hateful ideas. It can only punish someone for inciting violence. This is a fundamental principle of free speech.

Second, banning Nazi speech would set a dangerous precedent. If we allow the government to ban Nazi speech, then we open the door to banning all kinds of speech that the government doesn’t like. We could soon find ourselves in a situation where the only speech that is allowed is speech that the government approves of. That’s not a world I want to live in.

Third, banning Nazi speech would be ineffective. Nazis are not going to go away just because we ban their speech. They will simply go underground and continue to spread their hateful ideas. Additionally, banning Nazi speech would only make them more popular. As we’ve seen with other banned groups, such as the Ku Klux Klan, banning a group only makes it more attractive to people who are looking for something to rebel against.

Fourth, and finally, banning Nazi speech would violate the principles of free speech. Free speech is a fundamental right in our society. It’s one of the things that makes America great. And we should never give up our rights, even in the face of hate.

I understand that there are valid arguments on both sides of this debate. But, at the end of the day, I believe that everyone deserves free speech, even Nazis.

Free Social Media Speech

Under constant attack from the communist left is our constitutional right to speak freely. Whether it is the policies from the openly communist social media platforms who rule the internet or the narrative which condemns said speech, the left is suppressing the right-wing narrative and solely promoting left-wing nonsense.

Free speech is suppressed by unconstitutional policies, though it is also suppressed by what society deems acceptable. In addition to platforms banning free speech, conservatives are under constant abuse from the left and cannot comfortably express their thought, for fear of backlash from leftists.

What society considers acceptable speech today has changed promptly in recent years. I believe the main culprit for this rapid change are the social media companies. In the past, all words were fair game, with no restrictions, no censorship, and no such thing as hate speech. In the past, if something on the internet made you uncomfortable, you would ignore it and continue to browse.

Today is different. Instead of a free society where people choose what they post and choose what they read, the media companies instead decide what is acceptable. While they claim to “promote a safe environment” by banning “hateful content” they are instead controlling what society deems acceptable (as noted earlier).

Prominent examples of censored “hate speech” include referring to a female as “woman” or referring to a male as “man,” speaking against government mandates and the vaccine effectiveness, the exploitation of corrupt political schemes not accepted by the mainstream media, and humor.

Regardless of how many individuals do not agree with a social media post, it must be tolerated. It is up to each individual decide for themselves what they find acceptable, not communist social media companies.